$1.00Over the last 30 days, stored prices ranged from $1.00 to $1.00 across 2 capture days. Change between Aug 14, 2026 and Aug 28, 2026: 0%. Compares the same source, grade and signed status. Capture days are not completed-sale counts.
16
Asking prices
Based on eBay Active Listings
Source observation date unavailable
Price History
Loading price history
Product Overview
Description
The 1981 Topps Bengals Checklist card #488 serves as a crucial reference point for collectors tracking the Cincinnati Bengals roster during the early 1980s NFL season. As part of the broader 1981 Topps football set, this card provides a comprehensive list of players featured in the series, offering a snapshot of the team's composition at that specific time. For enthusiasts of vintage sports memorabilia, checklist cards hold a unique appeal, often acting as the final piece needed to complete a set or serving as a standalone item for those focused on team-specific collections. The design of the 1981 Topps release is characterized by its clean, straightforward layout, which prioritizes readability and information density. Card #488 specifically lists the Bengals players, allowing collectors to easily verify which cards belong to their team subset within the larger 660-card set. This functional aspect makes it a favorite among completists who value the organizational utility of checklist cards alongside the visual appeal of player portraits. Collecting vintage football cards from the 1980s has seen sustained interest, driven by a desire to preserve the history of the sport and its teams. The Cincinnati Bengals, established in the late 1960s, have a dedicated fanbase that extends into the collectibles market, making team-specific cards like this checklist a steady presence in hobby circulation. Whether you are hunting for high-grade examples or simply looking to add a piece of NFL history to your shelf, the 1981 Topps Bengals Checklist card represents a tangible connection to the league's past. The platform caters to hobbyists who appreciate the nuances of set completion and the historical context of trading card releases. By focusing on the identity and role of each card within its set, collectors can build meaningful collections that reflect their passion for the game and its heritage.
Last Listing Activity
5 days ago
Seller Action
Have one of these to sell?
We'll pre-fill the product details from this catalog entry, so your listing lands on this exact page. Just add photos of your copy, pick its condition, and set your price.
Product Specs
Card Details
The catalog profile below summarizes the card identity, featured subject, and notable collectible traits.
See how many public collections currently include this card.
0 collectors have this card
SuperCatch Expert Analysis
Market Value Insight
As a checklist card from the 1981 Topps set, this item occupies the lowest tier of market value relative to other cards featuring Cincinnati Bengals players. The absence of special attributes or notable player parallels means it trades significantly below the value of any individual player card within the same base set. Its current pricing reflects its status as a functional insert rather than a collectible featuring a specific athlete's performance or rookie status.
Rarity Breakdown
This card carries no specific scarcity mechanics such as serial numbering, short-print status, or parallel finishes, placing it in the standard base set category. Consequently, supply is determined solely by the original production volume of the 1981 Topps football set, with no artificial constraints limiting availability. Without unique identifying features or limited edition tags, it remains abundant in the secondary market compared to premium inserts.
Investment Outlook
The investment potential is limited due to its role as a generic checklist card lacking the rookie-card premium or player-specific demand drivers. Collectors typically prioritize individual player cards, particularly those of Hall of Famers or franchise legends, over the checklist page itself. Long-term value retention is unlikely to exceed broader set averages, as interest remains focused on the athletes rather than the set's organizational components.
