$1.00Over the last 30 days, stored prices ranged from $1.00 to $1.00 across 3 capture days. Change between Aug 17, 2026 and Sep 2, 2026: 0%. Compares the same source, grade and signed status. Capture days are not completed-sale counts.
19
Asking prices
Based on eBay Active Listings
Source observation date unavailable
Price History
Loading price history
Product Overview
Description
The 1992 Leaf Studio Randy Tomlin #88 baseball card represents a specific moment in the career of the Pittsburgh Pirates pitcher. Collectors often seek out cards from this set due to the manufacturer's unique aesthetic choices and the historical context of the 1992 baseball season. Randy Tomlin, featured as card number 88 in the Studio series, is identified by his affiliation with the Pittsburgh Pirates. For fans of the team and the National League, this card serves as a tangible piece of baseball history from that specific year. The Studio brand was notable for its glossy finish and modern layout, distinguishing it from more traditional trading card products of the early 1990s. This card is a standard base issue, making it a foundational piece for those looking to complete the 1992 Leaf Studio set or build a collection focused on Pirates players from that time. Collectors who value the 1992 Leaf Studio set often look for this card to round out their groupings. The product's identity is tied to its year of release and the player's team status at the time. Whether you are a dedicated set builder or a fan of the Pittsburgh Pirates, the 1992 Leaf Studio Randy Tomlin #88 card offers a clear link to the 1992 MLB season. The card's catalog number, 88, allows for easy identification within the broader Studio collection. It remains a recognizable item for those who follow the history of baseball card manufacturing in the early 1990s. The focus here is on the product's identity as a 1992 Leaf Studio release featuring Randy Tomlin. The card stands as a record of Tomlin's tenure with the Pirates during a competitive era of Major League Baseball. For collectors, understanding the set context and the player's team affiliation is key to appreciating the card's place in baseball memorabilia history.
Last Listing Activity
1 day ago
Seller Action
Have one of these to sell?
We'll pre-fill the product details from this catalog entry, so your listing lands on this exact page. Just add photos of your copy, pick its condition, and set your price.
Product Specs
Card Details
The catalog profile below summarizes the card identity, featured subject, and notable collectible traits.
See how many public collections currently include this card.
0 collectors have this card
SuperCatch Expert Analysis
Market Value Insight
This 1992 Leaf Studio card of Randy Tomlin currently trades at a minimal valuation tier, reflecting its status as a standard base issue of a player who did not achieve prolonged stardom. The lack of special attributes or high-grade scarcity keeps it well below the premium price tiers associated with rookie cards or Hall of Fame caliber athletes. It represents an entry-level acquisition for collectors seeking broad set completion rather than individual card appreciation.
Rarity Breakdown
The card is identified as a base issue within the 1992 Leaf Studio set, meaning it lacks the supply constraints of serial-numbered parallels, short prints, or one-of-one variants. Without specific scarcity mechanics like limited edition numbering or distinct parallel layers, the supply is determined solely by the original print run of the base set. This results in a standard availability profile common to non-premium inserts.
Investment Outlook
As a non-rookie card for a player with limited mainstream recognition, this item lacks the primary demand drivers that typically fuel long-term value growth in the sports card market. The investment outlook is neutral, as value appreciation is unlikely without a significant shift in the player's historical standing or a broader surge in demand for 1992 Leaf Studio base cards. It serves best as a component for completing a full set rather than as a standalone speculative asset.
