
Catalog information for the 1992 Upper Deck Low Number baseball card featuring Kevin Brown, card number 578.
1992 • Upper Deck • Low Number
Major League Baseball • Texas Rangers
Excellent
578
New
Shipping Calculated at Checkout
Arrives in 5-7 daysEstimated delivery October 23, 2026 - October 25, 2026
Seller returns October 19, 2026.30-day Returns| Condition | Value | Source | Trend | Price Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|
$0.94As of 9/30/2026 | Guide Estimate | |||
Raw / Ungraded
PriceCharting Price Guide · Guide Estimate evidence · captured Sep 30, 2026
History is building. At least two days of matching observations are needed to show a trend.
Each point is the last stored observation that day for this printing, condition, grader, autograph status and source. Gaps mean no observation; guide estimates and asking prices are not completed sales.The 1992 Upper Deck Low Number series represents a distinctive chapter in baseball card collecting, distinguishing itself through its specific numbering convention. This release, identified as card number 578, features Kevin Brown, who was affiliated with the Texas Rangers during this period. Collectors often seek out cards from this set due to the unique Low Number designation, which sets it apart from standard base sets of the early 1990s. For investors and hobbyists, this product serves as a tangible piece of MLB history from 1992. The Upper Deck brand is well-known for its glossy finish and high-quality production values, which remain a benchmark for sports trading cards today. The Low Number subset appeals to those interested in the nuances of set design and numbering systems that defined the era. Whether you are building a comprehensive collection of Upper Deck releases or focusing on specific players like Kevin Brown, this card offers a clear window into the 1992 baseball landscape. Understanding the context of the Low Number series helps collectors appreciate the variety within the 1992 Upper Deck lineup. It remains a relevant item for anyone tracking the evolution of baseball card design and player representation during the early 90s boom.
10 hours ago
We'll pre-fill the product details from this catalog entry, so your listing lands on this exact page. Just add photos of your copy, pick its condition, and set your price.
The catalog profile below summarizes the card identity, featured subject, and notable collectible traits.
The core identity of the card within the set.
The subject, team, league, and sport context tied to this card.
Production details and format-specific attributes.
Material
Card Stock
Language
English
Compare prices, grades, photos, and shipping from approved sellers.
New
Excellent
See how many public collections currently include this card.
0 collectors have this card
This 1992 Upper Deck Kevin Brown card represents an entry-level tier within the broader set, trading at a modest value relative to higher-demand parallels or rookie variations. While Brown holds a recognizable presence in MLB history, this specific base iteration does not command a significant premium over standard issues from the same era. The current market positioning suggests it serves primarily as a fill-in piece for complete set collectors rather than a high-value asset.
The card is identified as a base issue with no special attributes such as serial numbering, short printing, or parallel finishes noted in the provided data. Consequently, it carries the highest available supply within the 1992 Upper Deck Low Number set, lacking the scarcity mechanics that typically drive elevated valuation. Without unique identifiers or limited edition markers, its rarity is standard for mass-produced sports memorabilia of this vintage.
As a non-rookie base card from a high-volume production era, this item lacks the rookie-card premium mechanics that often drive long-term appreciation in the baseball market. Collector demand is likely driven by the need to complete specific set subsets rather than speculative growth based on player legacy. Investors should view this as a low-risk component for collection completeness rather than a standalone appreciating asset.
