
Jeff King
1996 • Topps
#116
1996 • Topps
Major League Baseball • Pittsburgh Pirates
Near Mint
322
New
Shipping Calculated at Checkout
| Condition | Value | Comps | Source | Price Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw / Ungraded | $0.99 | 27 | Asking prices Based on eBay Active Listings | Source observation date unavailable |
We'll pre-fill the product details from this catalog entry, so your listing lands on this exact page. Just add photos of your copy, pick its condition, and set your price.
The catalog profile below summarizes the card identity, featured subject, and notable collectible traits.
The subject, team, league, and sport context tied to this card.
Production details and format-specific attributes.
Material
Card Stock
Language
English
Compare prices, grades, photos, and shipping from verified sellers
SuperCatch
New
Near Mint
See how many public collections currently include this card.
0 collectors have this card
This 1996 Topps Dan Miceli card represents a low-tier entry point within the broader set, trading well below the premium associated with rookie cards or star players. As a non-star role player from the mid-90s era, it lacks the historical significance or scarcity that drives price appreciation. The current market positioning indicates it is accessible to casual collectors but holds minimal financial weight compared to key set components.
The card possesses no special scarcity attributes, such as serial numbering, short printing, or parallel finishes, meaning it is a standard base card. Supply is determined solely by the original print run of the 1996 Topps Baseball set, which was substantial and widely distributed. Without any unique limiting factors, the supply remains effectively unlimited relative to collector demand.
As a non-rookie card of a player with limited long-term career prominence, this item lacks the primary demand drivers necessary for investment growth. The absence of rookie status or special insert designation confines its appeal to basic set completionists rather than serious investors. Consequently, it is unlikely to experience significant value retention or appreciation over time.

1996 • Topps
#116

1996 • Topps
#241

1996 • Topps
#156

1996 • Topps
#415

1996 • Topps
#342