The Canyon Minotaur card from Magic: The Gathering's 2010 Core Set. This Red Minotaur Warrior is a staple for collectors completing the M11 set.
Canyon Minotaur
2010 • Magic: The Gathering • Magic
No Listings Available
No listings available right now.
Price History
Description
The Canyon Minotaur is a distinct creature card from the 2010 Magic: The Gathering Core Set, identified by the set code M11 and card number 126. As a Red Minotaur Warrior, it brings a classic fantasy archetype to the game, featuring a mana cost of {3}{R} and a power/toughness of 3/3. Designed by artist Steve Prescott, this common rarity card is a fundamental piece for enthusiasts of the Magic brand. For collectors focused on completing the M11 set, this card number is an essential component of the roster. Whether you are building a library or expanding a collection of vintage TCG cards, the Canyon Minotaur represents a key entry point into the 2010 era of Magic: The Gathering. The card's straightforward design and iconic creature type make it a recognizable item for those who appreciate the history of the trading card game.
Have one of these to sell?
We'll pre-fill the product details from this catalog entry, so your listing lands on this exact page. Just add photos of your copy, pick its condition, and set your price.
Card Details
The catalog profile below summarizes the card identity, featured subject, and notable collectible traits.
Catalog Profile
The core identity of the card within the set.
Featured Subject
The subject, team, league, and sport context tied to this card.
Featured
Canyon Minotaur
Game
Magic: The Gathering
TCG Attributes
Rarity, print treatment, and game-specific stats for this card.
Common
Steve Prescott
Card Stock
English
{3}{R}
Creature — Minotaur Warrior
3 / 3
R
Card Text
Abilities, attacks, oracle text, and flavor text printed on the card.
"We'll scale these cliffs, traverse Brittle Bridge, and then fight our way down the volcanic slopes on the other side." "Isn't the shortest route through the canyon?" "Yes." "So shouldn't we—" "No."