Collect the 2015 Battle for Zendikar Dispel card (BFZ #76), a foundational white instant from Magic: The Gathering designed by Chase Stone.
Dispel
2015 • Magic: The Gathering • Battle for Zendikar
No Listings Available
No listings available right now.
Price History
Description
Released in 2015 as part of the Battle for Zendikar expansion, Dispel is a white instant card identified by number 76 in the BFZ set. Designed by artist Chase Stone, this card serves as a staple counter spell for players seeking to disrupt their opponent's strategy during gameplay. Its low mana cost makes it a versatile tool across various formats, allowing collectors to build decks that emphasize control and reaction. For Magic: The Gathering enthusiasts, acquiring cards from this era offers a connection to a pivotal time in the game's history. Dispel remains a recognizable piece of that legacy, valued for its simplicity and effectiveness in the game's lore and mechanics. Whether you are looking to complete a set, enhance your deck's resilience, or invest in classic Magic cards, this product represents a solid addition to any serious collection. Explore the diverse inventory available to find the perfect pieces for your next project.
Have one of these to sell?
We'll pre-fill the product details from this catalog entry, so your listing lands on this exact page. Just add photos of your copy, pick its condition, and set your price.
Card Details
The catalog profile below summarizes the card identity, featured subject, and notable collectible traits.
Catalog Profile
The core identity of the card within the set.
Featured Subject
The subject, team, league, and sport context tied to this card.
Featured
Dispel
Game
Magic: The Gathering
TCG Attributes
Rarity, print treatment, and game-specific stats for this card.
Common
Chase Stone
Card Stock
English
{U}
Instant
U
Card Text
Abilities, attacks, oracle text, and flavor text printed on the card.
Counter target instant spell.
"I said we should destroy the Eldrazi. Ugin wanted to return them to stasis. Ugin's arguments were . . . unconvincing." —Jace Beleren