The Battle for Zendikar foil Dispel card is a 1-mana blue instant from the 2015 Magic: The Gathering expansion, featuring Chase Stone's art and card number 76.
Dispel
2015 • Magic: The Gathering • Battle for Zendikar
No Listings Available
No listings available right now.
Price History
Description
Dispel, identified as card number 76 in this set, is a blue common instant that provides a straightforward yet effective removal option for players. With a mana cost of only one blue mana, it offers an efficient way to counter target instant spells during gameplay. Collectors often seek out the foil version of this card to add a shimmering finish to their Battle for Zendikar collections. The foil treatment enhances the card's visual appeal, making it a desirable addition for those focused on set completion or parallel collecting. The card's text is attributed to artist Chase Stone, whose work defined the aesthetic of this era in the game. For fans of Magic: The Gathering, acquiring this foil card represents a tangible piece of the franchise's rich history and competitive landscape. It serves as a functional tool for gameplay and a decorative item for display, bridging the gap between utility and collectibility.
Have one of these to sell?
We'll pre-fill the product details from this catalog entry, so your listing lands on this exact page. Just add photos of your copy, pick its condition, and set your price.
Card Details
The catalog profile below summarizes the card identity, featured subject, and notable collectible traits.
Catalog Profile
The core identity of the card within the set.
Featured Subject
The subject, team, league, and sport context tied to this card.
Featured
Dispel
Game
Magic: The Gathering
TCG Attributes
Rarity, print treatment, and game-specific stats for this card.
Common
Chase Stone
Card Stock
English
Foil
{U}
Instant
U
Card Text
Abilities, attacks, oracle text, and flavor text printed on the card.
Counter target instant spell.
"I said we should destroy the Eldrazi. Ugin wanted to return them to stasis. Ugin's arguments were . . . unconvincing." —Jace Beleren