The 1989 Fleer Jim Clancy #229 captures the Toronto Blue Jays pitcher during a pivotal era in franchise history.
1989 • Fleer
Major League Baseball • Toronto Blue Jays
Near Mint
229
New
Shipping Calculated at Checkout
Arrives in 5-7 daysEstimated delivery October 23, 2026 - October 25, 2026
Seller returns October 19, 2026.30-day Returns| Condition | Value | Source | Trend | Price Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|
$0.99As of 10/2/2026 | Guide Estimate | |||
Raw / Ungraded
PriceCharting Price Guide · Guide Estimate evidence · captured Oct 2, 2026
History is building. At least two days of matching observations are needed to show a trend.
Each point is the last stored observation that day for this printing, condition, grader, autograph status and source. Gaps mean no observation; guide estimates and asking prices are not completed sales.Jim Clancy’s tenure with the Toronto Blue Jays in 1989 is a notable chapter in the franchise's evolution. This 1989 Fleer Jim Clancy #229 serves as a tangible connection to that specific season, offering collectors a direct link to the team's journey before their first World Series championship. Collectors often seek out this card to complete base set collections or to build deeper archives focused on the Blue Jays' late-1980s roster. Jim Clancy, a veteran right-handed pitcher, provides a grounded perspective on the team's pitching staff during this competitive period. For those interested in the broader narrative of the Blue Jays' rise to prominence, this card is an essential component. The appeal of the 1989 Fleer Jim Clancy #229 extends beyond simple completionism. It represents a specific moment in time when the Toronto Blue Jays were establishing themselves as a formidable force in Major League Baseball. Enthusiasts of the era appreciate the authenticity of the Fleer brand, which has maintained a strong reputation among collectors for decades. Whether you are a dedicated Blue Jays fan or a generalist baseball card collector, this card offers a clear, unadulterated glimpse into the sport's past. It stands as a reliable and recognizable piece for anyone looking to deepen their understanding of 1980s baseball memorabilia and the players who defined that generation.
15 hours ago
We'll pre-fill the product details from this catalog entry, so your listing lands on this exact page. Just add photos of your copy, pick its condition, and set your price.
The catalog profile below summarizes the card identity, featured subject, and notable collectible traits.
The subject, team, league, and sport context tied to this card.
Production details and format-specific attributes.
Material
Card Stock
Language
English
Compare prices, grades, photos, and shipping from approved sellers.
New
Near Mint
See how many public collections currently include this card.
0 collectors have this card
This 1989 Fleer card sits at the very bottom of Jim Clancy’s market tier, reflecting the standard entry-level pricing for common base cards from this era. While Clancy had a notable career tenure, the absence of any special attributes or high-grade certification keeps this item firmly in the bulk-catalog category. It serves primarily as a cost-effective way to complete a basic set rather than a standalone investment piece.
As a standard base card with no noted parallels, serial numbers, or short-print designations, this item benefits from a massive print run that inherently limits its scarcity. The lack of unique identifiers means it does not carry the supply constraints associated with limited-edition subsets or special inserts. Consequently, it represents the most common form factor available for this specific player and set combination.
The investment potential is minimal due to the card’s position as a non-premium parallel and its status as a non-rookie issue from a mid-career player. Collector demand for this specific SKU is driven by bulk-fill needs rather than speculative growth, keeping resale velocity steady but low. Unless a pristine graded example emerges from the depths of a large collection, the financial upside remains negligible compared to rookie or hallmark parallels.
